Rights to Light Case Law: Scott v Aimiuwu

The Rights to Light Case Law Scott v Aimiuwu (2015) is a significant County Court decision that explores the enforcement of rights to light and the remedies available when they are infringed.

Though not a High Court precedent, the case is widely cited in planning and surveying circles for its analysis of how courts weigh injunctive relief against monetary damages in neighbour disputes involving light obstruction.

Background of the Case

In Scott v Aimiuwu [2015], the claimants (Mr and Mrs Scott) owned a residential property adjacent to the defendants (Mr and Mrs Aimiuwu) in Potters Bar, Hertfordshire.

The Aimiuwus carried out works that included building an extension, which the Scotts claimed interfered with their right to light, specifically affecting light into their kitchen and dining room.

Notably, the Aimiuwus proceeded with their extension despite being warned of the potential rights to light issue and even after receiving legal correspondence from the Scotts' solicitors. The extension was completed before the matter reached trial.

Legal Issues - Rights to Light Case Law Scott v Aimiuwu

The court was asked to consider:

Whether there had been an actionable interference with the claimants’ right to light.

If so, whether the appropriate remedy was demolition via injunction or the award of damages in lieu.

The relevance of conduct and proportionality when deciding between an injunction and damages.

The Judgement

Judge Karen Walden-Smith found in favour of the claimants, holding that:

1. There had been a material interference with the claimants' rights to light. The extension significantly reduced natural light into their living spaces, and the court accepted expert evidence supporting this.

2. An injunction was refused, despite the infringement. The judge concluded that damages were an adequate remedy. The key reasons included:

The extension had already been completed, and demolition would be disproportionate.

The defendants acted in ignorance rather than bad faith (though they had received warnings).

There was no evidence of the claimants’ property value being diminished.

The degree of interference, while actionable, was not so oppressive as to warrant mandatory demolition.

3. The court awarded £31,499 in damages to the claimants, calculated based on the diminution in light and the impact on enjoyment, using a modified form of the Wrotham Park approach (i.e., a hypothetical negotiation for release of the right).

Importance in Rights to Light Case Law

Although a County Court decision, Scott v Aimiuwu has been influential in shaping practical advice given to developers and property owners. It underscores the increasing reluctance of courts to order demolition in favour of monetary compensation – especially in residential disputes where the infringement is not egregious.

Key Takeaways from Scott v Aimiuwu

Damages may suffice even where infringement is clear: This case illustrates a pragmatic judicial approach, where proportionality and completed works weigh against injunctive relief.

Early warnings are critical: Although the defendants were made aware of the rights to light issue, their misunderstanding and poor communication with surveyors and legal advisers mitigated the consequences.

Material interference must be proven: The court required detailed expert analysis to establish that the right to light had been infringed to a legally actionable degree.

Completed works factor into the remedy: Courts are more likely to award damages instead of forcing removal of a structure if it is already built and not flagrantly obstructive.

The Wrotham Park approach continues to guide damages: This hypothetical negotiation model remains a key method for calculating compensation in rights to light disputes.

Conclusion - Rights to Light Case Law Scott v Aimiuwu

Scott v Aimiuwu reinforces the principle that while rights to light are protected in law, the remedy is not always demolition. This case demonstrates the importance of expert advice, early dispute resolution, and proportionality in navigating rights to light claims.

For surveyors, developers, and property lawyers, Scott v Aimiuwu remains a crucial reference point in assessing risk and planning around neighbouring rights.

Rights to Law Case Law - Resources

Rights to Light Fact Sheet

What is a Right to Light

Rights to Light Case Law Colls v Home & Colonial

Rights to Light Case Law Regan v Paul

Contact : Rights to Light Case Scott v Aimiuwu

At Anstey Horne, we are specialists in Right to Light assessments, neighbourly matters, and daylight and sunlight reports. With decades of experience supporting residential and commercial developments across the UK, our team can help you navigate the legal, technical, and planning complexities.

Contact us today to book a consultation or for further advice.

We have compiled a collection of articles in our Rights to Light blog with more information on how a right is acquired, measured and defended, please see our collection

For advice on rights to light direct from one of our surveyors, please call our Rights to Light Enquiry Line on 020 4534 3138.

If you’d like us to call you, please fill in our Contact Us form and we will call you back.